Rachel Corrie, vid tillfället iklädd en mycket synlig självlysande väst, kördes helt enkelt över av bulldozern när hon, tillsammans med andra aktivister, försökte hindra den israeliska armén från att riva palestinska hem.

Mordet på Rachel Corrie visar tydligt det israeliska system av rättsröta och straffrihet för svåra brott, som av EU förklarats som ”ett utmärkt exempel på demokrati” i Mellanöstern – och mordet är bara ett i raden där den israeliska armén genomfört utomrättsliga avrättningar av oppositionella eller på annat sätt misshagliga personer.

Flera hundra palestinier – bland annat den handikappade Hamasledaren Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, och hans efterföljare Doktor Abdel Aziz Rantissi – har genom åren mördats utan att någon ställts till svars eller dömts för något brott. Över 1.400 palestinier dödades i Gaza under attackerna för tre år sedan utan några rättsliga konsekvenser. Minst 700 fall av tortyr i israeliska fängelser saknar utredning. Denna gång gällde det dock en amerikansk medborgare, vilket fått USA-administrationen att kräva en ”fullständig, öppen och tillförlitlig” utredning av omständigheterna kring hennes död – något som alltså inte skett.

Om USA nu tänker göra något ytterligare i fallet är oklart, men som viktigaste uppbackare av den israeliska våldspolitiken kommer man nog inte att agera särskilt starkt. Det nyligen uppgraderade
handelsavtalet mellan EU och Israel kräver dock respekt för mänskliga rättigheter och demokratiska principer (artikel 2) varför Sveriges regering har möjlighet, och skyldighet, att göra något. Man bör helt enkelt kräva att avtalet nu suspenderas, och tills vidare inställa allt samarbete med Israel inom vetenskap, sport och kultur.

I Rachel Corries hemstad Olympia, staten Washington, bojkottar sedan länge köpmarknader, bland annat den lokala COOP-kedjan, israeliska produkter. Detta initiativ bör följas även av svenska COOP och andra dagligvaruföretag. Som konsumenter kan vi skynda på processen genom att själva låta bli att köpa israeliskt. Siffrorna 729 i början av en varas streckkod betyder att den är tillverkad i Israel. Köp den inte!

Gunnar Olofsson

Published August 28, 2012

In Rachel Corrie verdict, Israel deals new blow to international law

For those who hoped for a just verdict on the death of Rachel Corrie, the American student and ISM activist killed by an Israeli bulldozer in Gaza in 2003 as she was defending a Palestinian home about to be demolished, this is a sad day. Not surprising, but still sad and bitter. The judge who decided the case, Oded Gershon, absolved the army of all blame, despite massive and internally contradictory testimony to the contrary. Moreover, he essentially blamed Rachel for her own death, commenting that a “normal person” would have run away from the bulldozer rather than confront it.

Palestinians and Israel human rights activists have learned that justice cannot be obtained through the Israeli judicial system. The Haifa District Court, in which the trial was held, could not have ruled other than how the state wanted. For the past 45 years of Israeli occupation, the Supreme Court has excluded from its rulings all reference to international humanitarian law and to the Fourth Geneva Convention in particular, which protects civilians living in conflict situations and under occupation. Only Israeli law applies in the Occupied Palestinian Territories – military law and orders – and the courts have restricted even that form of law by declaring that in instances of “security,” they defer to the military. As in Rachel’s case, the IDF thus has carte blanche to commit war crimes with impunity, with no fear of accountability or punishment.

Sending IDF American-made Caterpillar bulldozers to demolish Palestinian homes in Gaza or anywhere in the Occupied Territories is a war crime. To what degree Israel ignores, violates and distorts international law was particularly evident in the testimony of Pinhas “Pinky” Zuaretz, the brigade commander who supervised the illegal “clearing” of Palestinian homes from that area of Gaza. “There are no civilians in military conflicts,” he testified, directly contradicting one of the most fundamental principles of international law, the duty to protect non-combatants.

When justice and law become separated as they have in Israel, the law is demeaned and becomes merely another tool of oppression. As a human rights defender, a status articulated and defended by the UN, Rachel Corrie had every right – even a responsibility – to intervene in the violation of universal human rights. It is incumbent on governments, courts and concerned individuals alike to ensure that human rights are enforced, especially when those being oppressed have no power to defend themselves. The attempt of this Israeli court to present Rachel’s death as the consequence of the irresponsible actions of a person who should not have been defending Palestinian human rights in the first place denies both the culpability of a state engaged in illegal activities and the duty of citizens to work for universal justice.

While we all would have hoped that Rachel and her family could have received justice from the Israeli legal system – something also denied to the other human rights defenders, including Israelis, who have been killed and injured in their battle against the Israeli occupation – the issue at stake is even larger: holding Israel accountable for its actions. But eliminating any reference to international law, the Israeli judiciary, all the way up to the Supreme Court, has helped construct a legal system in which justice is impossible.

Universal jurisdiction requires that state courts enforce the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention. The International Criminal Court could be an appropriate venue to try Israeli military officials and their civilian superiors, including the defense minister at the time of Rachel’s death, Shaul Mofaz; the Chief of Staff, Moshe Ya’alon (now Israel’s deputy premier); the commander who presided over Gaza, Doron Almog; “Pinky” and the driver of the bulldozer. But since Israel (like the United States and China) is not a party to the ICC, that will not happen.

Until such a time that international law, human rights and justice are genuinely incorporated into national legal systems, in Israel and internationally, the rights and lives of all of us, “normative” citizens as well as the oppressed, are in jeopardy. This is what Rachel and her family have shown us so clearly. This is their genuine contribution, even if justice has been denied them. It is up to all of us to join with the Corries to carry on Rachel’s struggle for a just peace between Palestinians and Israelis – and for a world based on human rights and universal principles of justice.

Jeff Halper is the head of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD). He can be reached Den här e-postadressen skyddas mot spambots. Du måste tillåta JavaScript för att se den..